Disappointed in the New York Times
Friday, February 29th, 2008This article in the NYT is freakin’ ridiculous.
Should you click on that link, you will see sarcastic commentary about Merck’s recommendation to vaccinate boys with Gardasil, the HPV vaccine. How sarcastic? Oh, let’s see:
HOW cool are those Gardasil Girls? Riding horses, flinging softballs, bashing away on drum sets: on the television commercials, they are pugnacious and utterly winning. They want to be “One Less,” they chant — one less victim of cervical cancer. Get vaccinated with Gardasil, they urge their sisters. Protect yourselves against the human papillomavirus, or H.P.V., which causes cervical cancer.
Uh, has the author of this piece ever seen ANY other pharmaceutical commercial? I mean, if I never see one more person jumping through meadows of sunflowers, swimming with dolphins, and floating on rainbows because they have some medicine to help control some condition, it’ll be too soon. So, what’s the problem? I know I’d be pretty pleased if I never had to worry about some of the most common strains of HPV again (and thanks to my last shot of Gardasil yesterday, I won’t!).
They continue:
Will parents of sons consent to a three-shot regimen that has been marketed as benefiting girls? How do you pitch that to Gardasil Boy’s parents?
Think altruism. Responsibility. Chivalry, even? Oh, and yes: some explicit details about genital warts and sexual transmission.
Oh no! The poor boys! Having to take a “girl’s shot”! Whatever will they do?
I think the author of this piece forgot that, aside from providing personal protection against whatever you’ve been vaccinated against, shots are also for public health. As in, herd immunity. You vaccinate enough people against something, and soon, instances of whatever condition will drop dramatically, even among those who haven’t been vaccinated.
And, last I checked, guys were still able to get genital warts.
But at least Lisa Lippman gets it:
“If there was a vaccine I could take that would get rid of prostate cancer, why wouldn’t I?” said Lisa Lippman, a Manhattan real estate broker with three sons. “If there was a vaccine that sons could get that would get rid of breast cancer, most parents wouldn’t hesitate. But cervical cancer is the ‘sex cancer.’ ”
And as a last note, please pay attention to the disturbing, yet hilarious last quote in the article. Apparently, this woman’s son will not only not be having sex until he gets married, but he’ll have to be married a LONG TIME before he has sex. Who knows how long that’ll be. But with that attitude, her future daughter-in-law will probably HAVE to be a virgin, so why get the shot? Yuck.
So, I’m not at all shocked to learn that presidential candidate, Mike Huckabee, 
